Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

Kc means Kum Cheng (feeling for the girl) or kenna conned depend how you view.

For the Xiao Mei mei she offer massage at 120 or 150 full service. Normally massage only girls are allowed frs here but I see no difference with massage ladies who kc for higher price Sex than the one who advertised openly under the sponsor of this thread.

I throwing in some competitiveness good for the industry.

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

I tried her not long ago when she was at area "C".

It was a quick "commando" booking so I didn't know she was also posted as a FL in another site until I researched later.

Friendly lady, pleasant looking with good skin but figure not my type. Washed me up before and after. However IMO just another ML wannabe... massage CMI and 1×HJ. Full nude but positioned herself in a way I couldn't even roam south. In and out 35mins.

There are probably much better looking FLs out there (never tried before so just speculating)...

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

Reading some of the recent posts really make me laugh.
https://rebuildingrob.files.wordpres...4/01/spots.jpg

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

pls don't laugh at uncle me

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

Don't worry, he / we are not laughing at you.

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

https://www.sammyboyforum.nl/showpost.php?p=14792842

is this girl still around ?

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

Thank you unker, to be very simple.
I be as truthful to all as possible.
Bottom line to me is this, if i still go ahead and support ppl who use fake photo and still be unethical in this "dark market" really showing stupid stupid stinkyporeans are

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

Sometimes they have valid reasons to use fake photos. As long as the real person look pleasant, I will still proceed.

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

Yeah, I agree with this. Blur out and fake photos are sometimes used for a valid reason that we do not know. Still go through with it if the ML looks good or has a really good figure. Stats are not so far from what is adverised. :D

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

Do you wish that your family member,relatives and friends to know that you working at a online ML/FL with all this sexy photo and services？？？？

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

That is one of the common reasons.

Some are holding a singer pass, student visa, or work permit. Some are over stayers. Some have to avoid moron customers. The list goes on...

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

After quite a long hiatus, was thinking really hard who I should visit on my return. As rightly mentioned by Derrickboy, there are not many new MRs nowadays. Maybe everyone is away on holiday? Read both supermario and Derrickboy's recent review on Linn (LTD). Usually I prefer slim and tight bodies, but am willing to lower my expectations given both MRs indicate that she is pretty. So off I went.


Linn
http://www.liltigersden.com/linn/

Location: All too familiar area. Managed to get parking fairly quickly. Although when I left, the security guard from next door was eyeing me suspiciously coz its a fairly quiet neighborhood.

Looks: 6.5 (I have already lowered my expectations before I reached. But when the door was opened, I was still surprised. She definitely does not look pretty to me. Average GND looks and maybe even slightly below average? Guess looks are really subjective and she is definitely not my type. If you compare her actual looks to the pictures shown, I am a bit hard-pressed to find similarities. Her face is definitely round and not sharp as the pictures suggest. The youngish looking pictures may be from 4 to 5 years ago where she was much slimmer if that is indeed her. The only similarity I see is her long hair. She has very long hair. Guess I should have read the fine lines when derrickboy mentioned she is not the "gua-zi lian" type of pretty. :p)

Body: 6.5 (As mentioned, I usually go for slim gals. She is more of an Large size lady. But then again, the advert did indicate her weight is 55 although I am highly suspicious that it is understated. She does has a bit of spare tyre around the waist. The plus side was that she has a C cup).

Massage: 7.0 (To a certain extent, she does exhibit some massage techniques. After shooting, she will still perform a neck and head massage which was quite relaxing. At the start of the massage, she spent an inordinate amount of time massaging my backside. Wonder why do ladies like to massage backside. Haha..)

Sensual: 6.5 (I feel that she is quite new in this trade. Sensual touches are quite lacking as compared to seasoned MLs. When I finally turned over for the main dish, she was just kneeling down and tugging my rod away. Not lying beside me. Also, usually, when you shoot, seasoned pros will keep tugging away to ensure you shoot out and empty everything, but she just stopped after I shoot out my initial load. For some reason, bros like to pm me to ask me this question. So let me answer here instead. During the massage, she kept her clothes on throughout. But when she started the sensual and I slipped my hands under her clothing, she automatically, released one strap of her top to reveal her boobs. Don't ask me if there is any 3G or 4G. I didn't explore or ask for much coz frankly I was disappointed with her looks. And didn't want to explore the boundaries)

GFE: 6.5 (You can't really blame her as I wasn't really interested in chatting. She was also not interested in striking up conversation. Everything was pretty silent throughout the massage. Overall, she does gave the vibe that she is not a very chatty person. So if you like peace and silence during massages, you may enjoy the session).

RTM: Nope. She doesn't meet my minimum standard in the looks department. If you are looking for good looks, slim syt and high gfe - suggest to skip. If you are looking for decent strength in massage, some nice quiet moments to enjoy massage, newbie feel, C cup, no short-change in time - then perhaps you can try.

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

http://sglonelyguy.com/cong-cong-massage/

Location wise, very near train station. a short walk less than 5 min.
upon the door, she was definitely a milf. usual sop, bring me in, give me towel and bath alone. shower area was tiny.

Body: 7 - milf standard, dont expect so much

Hj: 7 - nothing much, mechanical, not much variation. after the first HJ,

after cumming, she cleaned me up with the toilet paper, she didnt wash her hand and proceed with massage!!!!! she might be jus purely lazy or she believe using dry toilet paper to clean is sufficient. i cant be bothered to question her cos im too tired.

Massage: 7.0 normal? not too bad to begin with

Sensual: 6.5 theres nothing much to shout about

RTM: Nope. the proper hygiene is definitely not there. HJ lack of skills. and $100 can be well spent somewhere!

Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
 

Yah perhaps you should have:o

Think the bar is set really low now (or our expectations have become unrealistic?).

My last 3 first time visit MLs (or FL in disguise) - SLG's summer, LTD's kylie & linn; all I got thought to reject when met them at the door.

The last real rtm ML for me is probably Erica and that was way back in April... after which no new MLs I visited more than twice.

JasonJG, i believe u are OKT!