Re: girls in 1654A
 

Dude, it is ok if "whore" comes to you and you don't voice it out. I think that is a good improvement.

Re: girls in 1654A
 

Up yiyi fr for awareness :rolleyes:

Re: girls in 1654A
 

What I mean is that I mention u a few times in my posts, later ppl will think too much again. LOL. My England very jialat. Haha.

Re: girls in 1654A
 

I am NOT an attention seeker. Anyway, talking to you online doesn't mean anything to me really. I talk to a lot of people, like Allanooi, stpboc, nakamitchi, slyer, max, saabking etc. I just blab anyways. Most samsters know that I just shoot my mouth but I am here for a good time and not really interested much in points. EG, I would say quite upfront I like chatting with people like nakamitchi, slyer, allanooi etc simply they are fun to disturb and they will fire me back if I am out of bounds I am pretty sure. It is a virtual world but still having friends sometimes online does help ease the boredom.

Re: girls in 1654A
 

Great minds think alike. I rather to have one virtual friend than a virtual enemy. Maybe i do not have much sense of humor. HAHA....

Re: girls in 1654A
 

And all I do is PCC virtually.

Re: girls in 1654A
 

So now u change target from rong rong to Yi Yi? :D

Re: girls in 1654A
 

This is my question, which in fact this is the 3rd time I have asked you ...

You've created a post on 3 July 2014 @ 1.43 AM to speak in defense of yourself that Federer801 is not your clone despite that no one has openly accused you before the above said date/time. Strangely, you have been keeping silence/absence in the GL sub-threads for days, and all of a sudden you appeared to speak in defense of yourself.

Federer801 posted a message on 3 July 2014 @ 5.17PM about him being zapped with a comment that he is your clone, which is a good 3 hours after your message ... Presumably no one alerts you prior to Federer801's post unless you have accessed to his USERCP window ...

How do you know someone was gonna accused you and why on earth do you need to be so guilty conscious to the extend of preempting someone might accuse you? This is tantamount to an admission of guilt as far as I can see ...

Re: girls in 1654A
 

Nothing change. Rong Rong code red & cock itchy so go find yiyi for a one time fuck

I also got go find Han Han from lor 14

just feel yiyi good enough to deserve a fr

Cheers

Btw Rong Rong should be starting work soon so its probably back to her :D

Anyway each to his own & Rong Rong my taste to a T :D

Re: girls in 1654A
 

Ah ok. I thank you for the effort to rehash this thing so I can explain. Now I understand where you are coming from roughly after reading this message and also going back to see the post. However, you have misread my post and jumped a little too quick to try and pin this Federer801 thing on me.

Never mind, I will give you the benefit of the doubt in this case, and assume you mean no malice by it, and that it's just an honest mistake

Let's look at what I said in that 3rd July 1.43am post you are referring to, which was actually a reply to Nato17: post:http://www.sammyboyforum.com/showpos...ostcount=10196

I read my post up and down. I can't see where federer801 is mentioned?

I am talking about something else altogether and never mentioned Federer801, but for some strange reason, you seem to want to jump at this particular portion of my post which you highlighted earlier in this post by you: http://www.sammyboyforum.com/showpos...ostcount=10269.

Now by the above line about me "keeping my silence in the forum" , I am referring to the period that I kept quiet between October and December last year, all the way till when a clone called Forbidden88 appeared to accuse me of having a clone called Forbidden87. Therefore, I had to come out of my silence and return to the forum back then last year, although I wanted very much to just keep quiet as per what was discussed between me and Nato17

You can see what happened below that caused me to come out again last year, and that is what I meant when I was explaining to Nato17 why I had come back out last year when I had told him I would leave the geylang section of forum back then out of respect for him.

referring to what I told him last year, nato17 had asked me: "That aside, do you remember your own words, "I will leave this forum....." I wonder whatever happened to that?"

So my reply to that was: "As for me keeping my silence in the forum, I did that out of respect for you as long as I could if you remember. But someone had to use a clone to stir something up again, and I had to come back out to defend myself unfortunately."


See the word "remember" in both nato17's question to me and also in my reply to him? Both me and Nato17referring to something way back in the past and not to any recent episode here.

It can all be seen in the 3rd July 1.43am post which I paste here again for easy reference: http://www.sammyboyforum.com/showpos...ostcount=10196

And then after two months of being a silent reader last year, because of this Forbidden87 saga, and an accusation made by another clone Forbidden88, I had to come out again as per what I said: "But someone had to use a clone to stir something up again, and I had to come back out to defend myself unfortunately."

The clone I am referring to is Forbidden88's accusation that I was behind Forbidden87, which is an utter lie so despicable that someone has to use a clone to make such a disgusting and unfounded accusation. :rolleyes:

All the while, this conversation between Nato17 and me is referring to when I told him I would be more quiet and post less LAST YEAR.

You can see the forbidden88 thing here and below: http://www.sammyboyforum.com/showpos...postcount=4010

Now you see what I mean? I was talking about one thing, but you read it as something else, and that's why I could not understand what you meant at first because we were referring to different things.

To summarise it, it's a simple misunderstanding on your part in this case.

But it's ok, people misunderstand sometimes, and I am sure you too have been a victim of such misunderstandings as well.

However, thanks for allowing me to explain and I guess that should settle it.

And for me, although there are some other issues I could certainly bring up related to this, I think I shall try not to pursue this matter any further so as to allow for more productive sharing in this forum.

Case closed.

Re: girls in 1654A
 

I see. No worries. I'm not envious of u haha cos both r not my cai :D I prefer slim syts ;) no conflicts of interests. Will return u favor in few days time cheers. :)

Re: girls in 1654A
 

Tried yi yi few weeks ago seem to me a gd wl but bbbj definitely not the best but overall still gd. How rong rong is different from her ?

Re: girls in 1654A
 

Neither does many of the gals tt provide good Service.

In fact these days, there seems to be more bickering About clones and guys than FR on gals.

Sad... Sighz.

Re: girls in 1654A
 

Hi guys, dun mind me saying this.

But can you guys stop the bickering and back and forth.

If need be, create a separate thread for discussion on clones.

We r here to source for FR and to share. If you think certain FR is inaccurate, then post ur own which u deem is accurate.

Samster will then vote with their wallet and free market forces will determine if a wl can survive.

Pls leave the FR threads alone. Thanks.

Re: girls in 1654A
 

Fully agree with u, but I think it's pointless cos some so called senior samsters have been living in this sammyboy
world for years and can't get out of it. Their high reputation point and status in this forum can be used as a tool to ask a wl for raw even? ( heard from one of the okts).
And another gang of samsters think they are the kings here cos they have frens frequent here so u can't tell them what to do and what not to, later they one ppl one comment will shoot till u quiet. So u better keep quiet and just read their nonsense ba.