Quote:
Originally Posted by HonkyTonkyMan
At time of divorce shop already closed down....I was not a shareholder or director the shop then was jointly operated with her sister..the 1m revenue statement was for the year before our divorce proceedings...before that i was actually a salaried man...
|
I see, so
if I am not wrong, then your wife (through her lawyer) would have presented a case to the judge that:
1. She should be have most of care & control since she has always be primary care giver.
2. She have problem (after divorcing since she needed to continue caring for your child) and need to re-enter work force.
3. Whereas you are doing relatively well because you are running your own business.
In essence, your 1.1K was actually maintenance your child even though your ex has full custody (something I don't understand, did you gave that up or was it care & control that she have?)
Only thing I don't get is why have to pay for her lawyer, this is something very out of character but then again, sometimes strange things happened.